|
CITY OF SACRAMENTO PROPOSED UTILITY RATE INCREASES
The City of Sacramento is preparing to raise
monthly rates on Garbage and Commingled Recycling Collection Service.
The public hearing will be on June 1st, and Director Carl Burton will
voice the League’s objection to both the rate increase and the hidden
11% utility tax built into the increase. Single and two family residents
would see a 3% increase for cost of operations and maintenance (O&M),
and debt payments. Rates for Lawn and Garden Refuse Collection and Street
Sweeping Service for single and two family residents would see two different
rates, one for the collection charge, and the other for street sweeping.
The collection charge would increase 17.51%. The sweeping charge would
not be increased. This is an overall increase of 15.22% for O&M and
debt payments. Street Sweeping for Multifamily and Nonresidential Parcels
would increase $1.19 (66%) for parcels with 3 to 5 residential units,
and $1.11 (52%) for parcels with 5 or more units.
Member Doug Nelson informed us that he objects
to these increases for three reasons. Firstly, weekly lawn and garden
pickup isn’t weekly as sometimes two or three weeks pass before
there is a pickup; secondly, there is a hidden 11% Enterprise Fund Tax
(EFT) included in the rates not disclosed on the City’s utility
service bill; and thirdly, that the increase is not warranted. The City
raised utility rates in July 2003 (which the League agreed was necessary)
to cover increased costs. Yet on April 30th The Bee reported that a multi-million
dollar increase in the cost of the City’s new utility service billing
system would be covered by revenues, “held back” from the
2003 rate increase. Obviously, last year’s increases were not used
to pay for increased costs, and instead was used to cover the City’s
latest fiasco. Doug made excellent points, and Carl will be at the June
meeting to voice the League’s objections.
SENATE BILL SB 2, HEALTH CARE –
AGAIN AND AGAIN
In the last two Tax Faxes we discussed the
approved SB 2. This $7 BILLION MANDATORY HEALTH CARE TAX requires employers
to provide health care coverage to employees and dependents by purchasing
coverage from any health care service plan, or by paying a fee to the
State Health Purchasing Program (SHPP), which would use a purchasing pool
to provide coverage. Frank Schubert, campaign manager for Californians
Against Government Run Health Care, a diverse coalition of businesses,
local governments, non-profits, community/civic groups, law enforcement,
education and medical groups, advised they qualified a referendum for
the November ballot that voters can use to overturn SB 2. The hope is
voters will overturn the state’s attempt to establish government
run health care.
GOVERNOR MAKES AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE FINANCIAL
PROTECTION FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
CitIes and Counties throughout the state,
through their backers Leave Our Community Assets Local (LOCAL) submitted
enough signatures to qualify a Proposition for the November ballot that
will end the high-jacking of property taxes by the state to cover state
budget shortfalls; that will end the state’s imposition of mandates
if they are not state funded; and that will require voter approval on
state legislation that would reduce funding sources for essential local
services. However, notwithstanding the LOCAL Proposition, as reported
in the Biweekly Newsletter of the Association of California Water Agencies:
“The sponsors of the LOCAL initiative (California State Association
of Counties, League of California Cities, and the Special Districts Association)
reached agreement May 12 with the Schwarzenegger administration on a funding
deal with local government to help with California’s budget crisis.”
The agreement amounts to painful short-term financial impacts on local
governments in exchange for a promise of long-term financial stability.
These latter agreements permit the state to extract $1.3 billion of local
government funds in 2004-05 and 2005-06 (total $2.6 billion) for a promise
to make the current car tax cut permanent; to provide revenue stability
for local governments by protecting their property tax income; to protect
local governments from unfunded state mandates; and to reform program
realignment of project funds. The Governor agreed to actively campaign
to have the Legislature put these protections in place with a constitutional
amendment next November. The Governor kept his word and has sent the reform
package, which includes the constitutional amendment voters must approve,
to the Legislature for approval. The next move is in their hands. If they
do not follow the Governor’s lead, there is little doubt the voters
will approve the LOCAL Initiative on the November ballot, which provides
nearly the same protections.
TAKING THE REINS OF SENIORS’ MAJOR
ISSUES
Last month, the Council of Seniors and Senior
Organizations (COSSO), the voice of senior’s organizations for many
years in the Sacramento area, whose public TV program “We Seniors”
won national awards, disbanded. Fortunately, on the Board of the Sacramento
County Taxpayers League are three long-term mainstay members of the former
COSSO, who will work with new Board Member Henry A. Hough, a Senior Vice
President, Western Operations of the national 60 Plus Association, along
with League Members who were Members of COSSO, to protect seniors in the
same manner that we protect taxpayers. 60 Plus is a 12-year old nonpartisan
group with a less taxes approach to senior’s issues. 60 Plus has
become one of the fastest growing seniors groups in the country, tripling
its support in the last year. 60 Plus can call on support from nearly
4.5 million citizen lobbyists to print and mail millions of letters, and
to petition. It publishes a newsletter, SENIOR VOICE, and a SCORECARD
bestowing a GUARDIAN OF SENIORS’ RIGHTS award on lawmakers in all
parties who vote “pro-senior.” 60 Plus has been called “an
increasingly influential lobbying group for the elderly.”
Director Hough advises that 60 Plus’s
“Big Three” issues for seniors are:
- Kill the Death Tax – 60 plus has been in the vanguard of the
effort to “Kill the Death Tax” for 11 years; and helped with the
current legislation to reduce the death tax that will expire in 2011, and are
supporting the President’s effort for a permanent repeal.
- Reform Social
Security – (so that it will be around for children
and grandchildren). 60 plus supports efforts to “PERSONALIZE” (rather
than privatize) Social Security. Present recipients will not be affected, but
younger people believe in the second coming of Elvis rather than Social Security
being around for them when they reach retirement age. There is no Social Security
fund, but rather a bucket of IOU’s. The system cannot be preserved
in its present form.
- Reform Medicare & Make Prescription Drugs Affordable to Those
who “NEED” Them – 60 Plus has supported bipartisan Breaux-Frist
(John Breaux, D-Louisiana and Bill Frist, R-Tennessee) Medicare Reform efforts
since 1995, and 60 Plus President Jim Martin was present at the President’s
signing of the Medicare Act.
MAYOR FARGO IS BACK WITH HER WHITE ELEPHANT
– THE DOWNTOWN ARENA
The Mayor is back with her Taj Mahal for the second
time, stooged by the Sacramento Chamber of Commerce. This time it’s a real doozie. Tear down part of
the K Street Mall, and dump the Downtown Arena in the hole. Cost–over
$500 million and growing. Paid by? Taxpayers of course. The multi-millionaire
Sacramento Kings owners’ contribution for the playground for their millionaire
players will probably be a promissory note, which they may, or may not pay
based on past performance. The Maloofs took on a $73.7 million loan for the
Kings’ arena at Arco and now owe over $83 million.
Lets’ review the bidding. Last October, the Sacramento City Council
workshop on the Downtown Arena became a comedy hour presentation on what was
to have been an analysis of the cost of the Arena. The workshop literally dissolved,
and had to be rescheduled. The subject of an advisory vote on the March primary
election had been discussed, and the consensus was that there was not enough
time, nor information available to make a coherent Measure to put before the
voters. The downtown restaurant and business owners met with City officials
and voiced opposition to a plan that would saddle them with surcharges (which
Councilman Dave Jones accurately called taxes) for 30 years to finance $287
million of an estimated $538 million for the entire project, including the
Arena. Mayor Fargo gave up on the advisory vote. The Bee reported that the
Maloofs said the City “sabotaged” the Arena and contended that
City Manager Bob Thomas and developer Millennia Associates, who would design
and build the entire complex, lied to them by first assuring them that the
Arena would be a catalyst for downtown redevelopment, and the asserted redevelopment “could-and
even should-go ahead without the facility.”
Notwithstanding that The Sacramento Bee predicted: “Another study won’t
make the Arena realistic”; the Metro Chamber forged ahead, and came up
with the present boondoggle. We can hardly wait to see how they propose to
milk the taxpayers and businesses for this one. Should be a replay of the first
comedy on this ongoing travesty. If Vaudeville were still alive, the City could
take this one on the road!
ANOTHER TAX ON TELEPHONE SERVICE
It’s surprising we can lift the telephone
instrument, as it is loaded with taxes hung on by every elected element
in the US from the federal level to every city in the nation. And now,
for-profit hospitals and emergency doctors in California want in on the
act. They are having trouble funding their emergency rooms, and want to
subsidize emergency room costs by piggybacking on the state’s 911
tax on telephone service. The 911 tax was created to cover the cost of
the establishing and operating 911 communications services throughout
the state. The hospitals want to raise the state’s 911 tax for communications
by 3%, which, it is estimated, would bring in about $540 million each
year, and leave less than one-percent of the increase in the 911 services
account. They call their Proposition the “911 Emergency Care Initiative”,
and there seems to be no doubt that it will be on the November ballot.
The interesting thing is that the major supporters of the Initiative,
i.e., the California Healthcare Association, which formed the Coalition
to Preserve Emergency Care, which launched the Initiative, have withdrawn
their support, and that’s the “rest of the story.” The
League is going to watch the progress on this Initiative carefully, to
see if it is certified, and if so, will consider a position on the Initiative
at the June 17th Board meeting.
NOVEMBER WE WILL VOTE ON TWO GAMBLING
PROPOSITIONS
Two Initiatives covering gambling have been certified
for November’s
ballot. One, sponsored by the Cahuilla Indians of Palm Springs, would remove
limits on the kinds of games Indian Casino’s can offer; would remove
limits on the number of slot machines and Casinos on tribal land; and would
extend the current 20 year contracts with the state to 99 years. In return
they would pay the state 8.84% of net profit received, matching the present
corporate tax rate. Presently the Indian Casinos pay no taxes, and nothing
into the state’s General Fund.
The second Initiative, sponsored by racetrack
and card room owners in southern California and the Bay area, would require
Indian
Casinos to pay 25% of their
net profit to a special state fund. The tribes would have 90 days to agree,
and if any of the tribes refused, there would be 16 new non Indian Casinos
authorized, 5 at racetracks and 11 at card rooms with a composite of 30,000
slot machines. The Initiative proposes that 33% of the gambling revenues from
non Indian Casinos be provided to a special state fund and states: “This
measure would have the following major fiscal effect: Increased revenues of
likely over $1 billion annually from new gambling revenues. The revenues would
be used primarily for additional firefighting, police and child protective
services.” Because the Initiative requires a set percentage of the money
to go to police and fire services, Sacramento Sheriff Lou Blanas and Los Angeles
Sheriff Lee Baca have become front men for the Initiative.
Governor Schwarzenegger is also in the game, hoping
to renegotiate exiting gambling contracts with the tribes to obtain more
money
for the state. His
approach is to let Indian tribes expand their gambling, but only on existing
sites. He stated, “They can expand gaming activity, but we don’t
want it all over the place.”
OTHER PROPOSITIONS FOR NEXT NOVEMBER’S
ELECTION
Allegedly, 17 Propositions have been, or are being certified for the November
ballot. Some were discussed above. Another is a Mental Health Measure, which
would put a one-percent income tax surcharge on those earning one-million or
more a year to provide for its funding. Another would increase taxes on commercial
properties, earmarking the proceeds for preschools and teachers salaries. And
yet another, formed by a coalition of taxpayers, automobile dealers, business
groups, and civil justice reform supporters make up Californians to Stop Shakedown
Lawsuits, which has submitted sufficient signatures to qualify a Proposition
that would end the shakedown by lawyers threatening to file suit against small
business owners. In the scheme, lawyers seek settlement from threatened small
businesses that pay to avoid the higher cost of fighting the lawsuits.
The other Propositions will gain publicity as they qualify.
MEMBERSHIP RECRUITMENT
Our Members constitute the League’s strength,
and traditionally new Members are recruited by our present Members to enlarge
our base. Our Office
Manager, Susan Ferrell is sensitive to this effort as is witnessed by her special
plea to Members on Page 2.
Taxpayers are to be assaulted as never before
for additional money from every level of government in the form of fees,
assessments, rates,
and taxes. Locally,
the Taxpayers League is the only recognized and organized defender of the County
and its Cities’ taxpayers capable of putting up a viable defense. Over
our 43 years, we have successfully defeated many attempts to raise taxes, rates,
fees, and assessments in the County of Sacramento. Such battles are expensive.
And those we are engaged in now, and new attacks to be faced, are frightful.
Members must remember that the League is composed of dedicated volunteers who
battle not only on Member’s behalf, but also on behalf of people who
virtually cannot help themselves forestall the onslaught. To be successful
we need more Members working to strengthen the League by recruiting friends
and associates as League Members.
LETTERS TO THE LEAGUE
We seek “Letters to the League” from
Members concerning projects and issues on which we are working, along
with recommendations on those we should look at. Letters may be edited
and republished in any format, primarily in the interest of available
space. Send letters, faxes, or e-mail to the Sacramento County Taxpayers
League. Our e-mail is sactaxleague@prodigy.net;
our telephone number is (916) 921-5991. Our fax number is (916) 567-1279.
And our address is:
Sacramento County Taxpayers League
1804 Tribute Road, Suite 207
Sacramento, CA 95815.
MEMORIAL DAY
Memorial Day honors those that gave their lives
in defense of our United States, and so it should be. I’ve said before, and I repeat, for me it’s
a day I never look forward to. Memories of those I served with in Italy during
World War II are too vivid, and those we lost too painful, to make the day
at all pleasant. And now I believe I am the last of my Ordnance unit still
alive, as the others seemed to have passed on, the last being Sergeant Herbie
Schepps, who died last year in Florida.
However there was one hero of WW II, that befriended
me, and whom passed away in 1975, which I will always remember. He was Wendall
Fertig, superintendent
of the largest iron mine in the Philippines when the war broke out. A reserve
Lt. Colonel, he was recalled to active duty, and when Major General Sharp surrendered
in May 1942, Wendall was with a Corps of Engineers Captain and a Navy Chief
in the central hills of Mindanao. Refusing to surrender, the three fought on,
leading thousands of Filipinos in a seemingly hopeless war against the Japanese.
And when the Americans returned to Mindanao 3 years later they found Fertig
virtually in control of one of the world’s largest islands, commanding
an army of 35,000 men, and at the head of a civil government with its own post
office, law courts, currency, factories, and hospitals.
At the Colorado School of Mines, when in Mine’s ROTC program 1948-50,
our Professor of Military Science and Tactics was Colonel Wendall Fertig. In
the ROTC I got to know the Colonel and his wife Mary well, and was designated
by him as a Distinguished Military Graduate, which resulted in my being offered
a Regular Army Commission as an Ordnance Officer, in lieu of a Reserve Commission
in the Corps of Engineers. I was a Junior at the time, and had I accepted I
would have gone into the army immediately. My wife and I had dinner at Wendall
and Mary’s home, and I asked for his advice. Notwithstanding his selection
of me, he recommended I complete school, and accept the Corps’ Commission
that summer with the rest of the cadets. I did so, was commissioned in June
1950, and graduated in 1951 as a Geological Engineer.
In 1956, I returned to Mines from Venezuela for
additional courses in Petroleum Engineering, and worked as a consultant Geologist
for
Ball Associates in Denver.
I shared an office with Wendall Fertig, whom had retired from the army, and
was Ball’s Chief Mining consultant. We spent many hours together, Wendall
telling me many stories about the Philippine American “guerrilleros” who
fought under him. He was working on a book about his adventures in the war,
which John Keats later authored in 1963 as a best seller under the title “They
Fought Alone”.
I tell this story as I learned the book would
become a movie, starring Brad Pitt. I hope to see this movie, as I’m
curious to see how close Pitt can emulate my instructor and friend, Wendall
Fertig,
a valiant American hero
who would not surrender.
Joe Sullivan
Executive Director
|